COUNTDOWN TO CROKER – PICTURE OF THE DAY (AND A TRIP FROM RIO!)

first_imgPicture taken in the famous townland of Mullaghduff three days before the All-Ireland in 1992…..Declan, Paul, Elaine and Kevin (The Yank) Boyle decked out in Donegal gear.None of them made it to Croker that weekend in ’92 but all four are hoping to get there for this one with Elaine flying in from Rio de Janeiro where she lives and works.  COUNTDOWN TO CROKER – PICTURE OF THE DAY (AND A TRIP FROM RIO!) was last modified: September 8th, 2012 by BrendaShare this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Tags:COUNTDOWN TO CROKER – PICTURE OF THE DAY (AND A TRIP FROM RIO!)last_img read more

Macchiarini guilty of misconduct but whistleblowers share blame new Karolinska Institute verdict

first_img The Karolinska Institute (KI) in Stockholm has finally, officially, found disgraced surgeon Paolo Macchiarini guilty of scientific misconduct. Macchiarini was widely hailed as a pioneer in regenerative medicine for his technique of implanting artificial tracheae seeded with a patient’s own stem cells into patients, but KI fired him in 2016 amid allegations of fraud and other types of misconduct.However, the verdict is a bitter pill for the four people who raised the alarm about Macchiarini’s fraud. In a report issued yesterday, KI President Ole Petter Ottersen finds one of them, Karl-Henrik Grinnemo, a surgeon and stem cell researcher at KI and Uppsala University in Sweden, guilty of misconduct as well, based on his involvement in a paper he and others co-authored with Macchiarini in The Lancet in 2011. And the report says two others are “blameworthy” for their roles in a 2013 paper in Biomaterials that describes data from a patient for whom there was no ethical approval in place.“This sends the message that whistleblowers in research will be punished. That’s a serious problem for research,” says cardiothoracic surgeon Oscar Simonson, one of the whistleblowers, who now works at Uppsala University Hospital. He and his colleagues “spent thousands of hours over 5 years” uncovering and documenting the problems with Macchiarini’s research and the papers in question. (The report says Simonson is “blameworthy,” but not responsible for misconduct for his role in the 2013 paper.)  This sends the message that whistleblowers in research will be punished. That’s a serious problem for research. Sign up for our daily newsletter Get more great content like this delivered right to you! Country The verdict is “a continuation of the harassment by Karolinska leadership” of the whistleblowers, Grinnemo says. “They used our own investigation against us, to find things we should have done differently.”Ottersen acknowledges that how to judge the whistleblowers “has been the major difficulty with this decision.” The university wanted to send two clear messages, he says. First, that “we commend these four people for their role” in uncovering the scandal. “Any organization needs whistleblowers, because it is essential that flaws and misconduct be brought to the attention of society.” At the same time, he says, “The other signal that is also important is that you cannot absolve yourself of responsibility [for misconduct] by blowing the whistle after the fact.”The decision says six papers authored by Macchiarini should be retracted. It is KI’s official response to an earlier evaluation by the Swedish Central Ethical Review Board, published in October 2017. That report recommended that the same six papers be retracted and said its 46 authors were all guilty of misconduct, although it did acknowledge that some authors bore more responsibility than others.KI regulations allowed those involved to respond to the report before Ottersen decided on a final verdict. After reviewing the responses, he decided to differentiate between authors who were responsible for misconduct, those who were “blameworthy” but not directly responsible, and those who could be cleared of blame.  Email By Gretchen VogelJun. 26, 2018 , 4:05 PM Macchiarini guilty of misconduct, but whistleblowers share blame, new Karolinska Institute verdict finds Ole Petter Ottersen, president of the Karolinska Institute, acknowledges that how to judge the whistleblowers was “the major difficulty” for him. Erik Cronberg/Karolinska Institute (CC-BY-NC-ND) Grinnemo and three colleagues filed detailed complaints to the university in August 2014, describing how clinical records of the three patients who received implants at KI did not match descriptions of their conditions in published papers. The university ignored the complaints for several months but finally asked an external reviewer to investigate. KI initially overruled the reviewer’s decision that Macchiarini committed misconduct, but in January 2016 a troubling documentary on Swedish television raised additional questions about Macchiarini’s work, which prompted KI to reopen the investigation and eventually fire Macchiarini.The 2011 Lancet paper, about the first artificial trachea implant, claimed the recipient had no complications 5 months after the surgery. That wasn’t true, and given his role in the original surgery and in referring patient biopsies afterward, Grinnemo had to know this, the report says. Although “all credit must go … to the four whistleblowers for submitting a thoroughly grounded complaint and thus triggering this investigation,” that doesn’t clear Grinnemo, the report says.Grinnemo says he was not working at the hospitals where the patient was being treated after surgery—he was at a different campus and at the time he had no reason not to trust his co-authors’ description of the patient’s condition. The biopsy referral was a purely bureaucratic procedure, he says, because Macchiarini was in a different department from the pathologist. Grinnemo says he never handled the samples directly. In fact, he and his colleagues later pieced together how the samples were mislabeled as part of their original complaint to KI.Ottersen says the university hopes to reach a decision soon about what, if any, sanctions to impose on Grinnemo and other current employees. “We have a responsibility to those who have been singled out. We don’t want to leave them in limbo,” he says.Grinnemo and Simonson say a number of researchers from across Sweden are preparing a formal complaint about the verdict, disputing the decision to cast blame on the whistleblowers. “This is not the end of the story,” Simonson says.It isn’t clear whether Macchiarini will face any additional sanctions based on the KI decision. He and several co-authors recently published a new paper on an artificial esophagus seeded with stem cells. Oscar Simonson, Uppsala University Click to view the privacy policy. Required fields are indicated by an asterisk (*) Country * Afghanistan Aland Islands Albania Algeria Andorra Angola Anguilla Antarctica Antigua and Barbuda Argentina Armenia Aruba Australia Austria Azerbaijan Bahamas Bahrain Bangladesh Barbados Belarus Belgium Belize Benin Bermuda Bhutan Bolivia, Plurinational State of Bonaire, Sint Eustatius and Saba Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana Bouvet Island Brazil British Indian Ocean Territory Brunei Darussalam Bulgaria Burkina Faso Burundi Cambodia Cameroon Canada Cape Verde Cayman Islands Central African Republic Chad Chile China Christmas Island Cocos (Keeling) Islands Colombia Comoros Congo Congo, the Democratic Republic of the Cook Islands Costa Rica Cote d’Ivoire Croatia Cuba Curaçao Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark Djibouti Dominica Dominican Republic Ecuador Egypt El Salvador Equatorial Guinea Eritrea Estonia Ethiopia Falkland Islands (Malvinas) Faroe Islands Fiji Finland France French Guiana French Polynesia French Southern Territories Gabon Gambia Georgia Germany Ghana Gibraltar Greece Greenland Grenada Guadeloupe Guatemala Guernsey Guinea Guinea-Bissau Guyana Haiti Heard Island and McDonald Islands Holy See (Vatican City State) Honduras Hungary Iceland India Indonesia Iran, Islamic Republic of Iraq Ireland Isle of Man Israel Italy Jamaica Japan Jersey Jordan Kazakhstan Kenya Kiribati Korea, Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, Republic of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Lao People’s Democratic Republic Latvia Lebanon Lesotho Liberia Libyan Arab Jamahiriya Liechtenstein Lithuania Luxembourg Macao Macedonia, the former Yugoslav Republic of Madagascar Malawi Malaysia Maldives Mali Malta Martinique Mauritania Mauritius Mayotte Mexico Moldova, Republic of Monaco Mongolia Montenegro Montserrat Morocco Mozambique Myanmar Namibia Nauru Nepal Netherlands New Caledonia New Zealand Nicaragua Niger Nigeria Niue Norfolk Island Norway Oman Pakistan Palestine Panama Papua New Guinea Paraguay Peru Philippines Pitcairn Poland Portugal Qatar Reunion Romania Russian Federation Rwanda Saint Barthélemy Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Saint Kitts and Nevis Saint Lucia Saint Martin (French part) Saint Pierre and Miquelon Saint Vincent and the Grenadines Samoa San Marino Sao Tome and Principe Saudi Arabia Senegal Serbia Seychelles Sierra Leone Singapore Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Slovakia Slovenia Solomon Islands Somalia South Africa South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands South Sudan Spain Sri Lanka Sudan Suriname Svalbard and Jan Mayen Swaziland Sweden Switzerland Syrian Arab Republic Taiwan Tajikistan Tanzania, United Republic of Thailand Timor-Leste Togo Tokelau Tonga Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia Turkey Turkmenistan Turks and Caicos Islands Tuvalu Uganda Ukraine United Arab Emirates United Kingdom United States Uruguay Uzbekistan Vanuatu Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of Vietnam Virgin Islands, British Wallis and Futuna Western Sahara Yemen Zambia Zimbabwelast_img read more